-Story: [1 out of 5] Overlooking all the discrepancies in this movie, the story might be perceived as interesting/entertaining… to an extent, I’d presume. -Originality: [0 out of 5] Now it’s not only Frank Rajah stealing Bollywood [...]
-Story: [0 out of 5] You have not seen a useless movie, unless you’ve seen Touch my soul. I honestly believe that the movie was made with the sole aim of trying to find out how stupid a movie one can make. The screenplay is ridiculous, I mean what [...]
-Story: [0 out of 5] There is literally no story to this movie. It is simply 100 minutes of the camera travelling around different locations with different people murmuring different incoherent words that have literally no meaning. Alright, maybe I was [...]
-Story: [0 out of 5] Alright, maybe I was a tad bit unkind in the introduction but it is the fact. Maybe this movie had a story but it was not well developed at all. I guess if you filter through the debris of this movie enough you might eventually find [...]
-Story: [2 out of 5] Personally, I did not think the story was that fantastic, I kept falling asleep and waking up again through the entire thing. Then I’d have to rewind to the last point I watched, only for me to fall asleep again and do it all [...]
-Story: [3 out of 5] Although this was a long, I mean really really long movie, it had a story. The story was quite entertaining, I don’t think this is one of the movies that one hits their head after the end of the four parts and thinks [...]
-Story: [2 out of 5] The general storyline is extremely amusing and highly entertaining (especially the scenes with Artus) but in most scenes (i.e most of the scenes with Beverly) the movie took a turn for the worse (i.e Boring). My sincere advise to you [...]
 -Story: [2 out of 5] The story to this movie was quite entertaining in itself but all the movements of the timeline (two years later, three years before, 2 weeks later, present day) had a tendency to confuse a person. The ending is a bit anti-climactic [...]
